Johnston & Johnston v Conseco
- 2013 0403 (Date Filed): Document: 00512196967 - BRIEF OF APPELLEE, JOHNSTON & JOHNSTON - 65p
- 2013 0312 - ACLI - Amicus Brief - Johnston and Johnston v Conseco - 24-1/2 - 13-30010 - 54p
- 24-1 - (p11) - A. Because of the unique nature of flexible premium policies, they do ot have traditional dates when premiums are “due,” making it difficult to calculate notice provisions keyed off when premiums are “due.”
- 2013 0423 - ACLI - Amicus Brief - Johnston and Johnston v Conseco - 13-30010 - 48p
- 2013 0905 - LC - Johnston & Johnston v Conseco - 5th Circuit Court of Appeals - 13-30010 - Oral Argument - mp3 --- [BonkNote]
- ORAL ARGUMENT HEARD before Judges Carl Stewart, Carolyn King, Prado. Arguing Person Information Updated for: George Adam Cossey arguing for Appellee Johnston & Johnston; Arguing Person Information Updated for: Jason Allen Walters arguing for Appellant Conseco Life Insurance Company
- 2013 1017 (Date Filed): Document: 00512412127 - 23p
- V. CONCLUSION - For the aforementioned reasons, we REVERSE the judgment against Conseco and REMAND for entry of judgment in its favor.
- 2012 1213 - CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-1552 (W.D. La. Jan. 16, 2014)
- 2013 - 2014 0220 - 2014 0627 - U.S. Court Of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
- [Doc. No. 27 at p. 7 (quoting Boring v. Louisiana State Ins. Co., 97 So. 856 (La. 1923)).
- Turnerv. OM Fin. Life Ins. Co., 822 F. Supp. 2d 633, 634 (W.D. La. 2011).
- old premium legal case
- Judge
- First principles - agreement on Premium
- hybrid term perm policy
- Legal cases aren't usually about premium due date
- Judge
- my father said never buy a universal life policy... he was right