Regulatory
Company Investments
Company Investments
- The nature of the life insurance industry calls for a relatively conservative investment policy, with safety of principal being of highest importance.
— ROBERT R. WYAND II
1977 – SOA – Investment Strategy and Planning, rsa77v3n110 0 Society of Actuaries – 16p
- (p86) – 27. Selected assets and liabilities of savings institutions – C. Life insurance companies – Millions of dollars, end of period
1980 – FRB – Annual Statistical Digest, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System – 244p
- (p20) – Life insurers are the single largest source of corporate bond financial, and hold approximately 18 percent of total U.S. corporate bonds.
— Statement of Patrick S. Baird, Chief Executive Officer, Aegon USA, LLC, On Behalf of the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI)
[PDF-181p,
- (p977) – The life insurance companies have pretty much abandoned the residential mortgage market in the past 10 years.
- The life insurance companies and the pension funds which are the primary sources of long-term credit for corporations have had a significant and steady build-up in their resources.
— Statement of John Hart, President, National Association of Home Builders
1976 0317-23 – GOV (House) – The Financial Reform Act of 1976 – Part 2 – [PDF-761p-GooglePlay
- When the MSVR was first established in 1951, common stocks represented only 1.2 percent of the assets of U.S. life insurance companies.
- However, the sharp rise in common stock prices during the 1950s and early 1960s, combined with the stimulus of statutes enacted in New York and other states authorizing increased common stock purchases by life insurers, resulted in a substantial growth in holdings.
- Common stocks for all companies increased from $820 million in 195l to $7.6 billion at the end of 1969 and amounted to 3.9 percent of total assets in the general accounts.
1983-2, NAIC Proceedings
- 1952 – LR – Legal Framework, Trends, And Developments In Investment Practices Of Life Insurance Companies – 41p
- 1959 – SOA – The Changing Pattern of Life Insurance Investments in the United States, Society of Actuaries – 34p
- 1980 – SOA – Investment Policies of Life Insurance Companies, Society of Actuaries – 20p
- Between 1947 and 1952, the excess of the rate on new investments was due to an expansion in the field of investment, from largely Federal Government bonds to a wide range of mortgages, public utility, industrial and other purchases.
- From 1952 to 1956, the structure of market interest rates has itself generally moved upwards.
— B. T. Holmes
1957 – SOA – Life Insurance Policies, Premiums and Dividends, Society of Actuaries – 9p
- 1983 0506 – Governor Proposes Insurance Law Reform
- STATE OF NEW YORK-EXECUTIVE CHAMBER
- Governor Cuomo announced today he has submitted
legislation reforming the New York State Insurance Law
to liberalize limitations on investments and activities of
insurance companies in the State and at the same time
make boards of directors of insurance companies more
accountable to the public. (p376 / 1600)
- Governor Cuomo announced today he has submitted
1983 – New York – Public papers of Governor Mario M. Cuomo, Part 2 – p1225-2210 – 999p
- One important class of investors in Government securities is insurance companies.
- Life insurance companies have been liquidating a small proportion of their Government security holdings since the end of the war as new investment opportunities unfolded, as shown on Chart 9. (p160)
1949 01 – (GOV-JEC) – January 1949 Economic Report of the President – 698p
ATTACHMENT ONE-A1
TO: Prudent Person Model Investment Law Working GroupFROM: Wisconsin Office of the Commissioner of Insurance
DATE: April 17, 1996
SUBJECT: Wisconsin’s Approach to the Regulation of Insurance Company Investments
- The Wisconsin approach to the regulation of insurance company investments, while very different from the pending model and the concept drafts under review by this working group, has been very successful for Wisconsin.
- No domestic insurer has suffered investment-related insolvency since this approach was adopted in 1971.
- We appreciate this opportunity to explain the methods Wisconsin has employed to achieve these results and our observations as to why this success was possible. (p564)
1996-1, NAIC Proceedings
Defamation
Defamation
1960s
- 1964 - LC - New York Times Company v. Sullivan
- oyez.org/cases/1963/39
- Defamation, Civil Rights
- [Bonk: Sounds like Crowd Funding]
2010s
- 2010 0911 - New York Times - The Loneliest Analyst - [link]
- BankAtlantic accused Richard Bove, a bank analyst, of defamation after he wrote a critical report. He received little support from his peers in the industry before the suit was settled.
- New York Times - BankAtlantic v Richard Bove - 482p
- 2015 - LC - Brokers' Choice of America and Tyrone M. Clark v. NBC UNIVERSAL - Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit - No. 15-1386
- 2008 0413 - Tricks of the trade - A Dateline hidden camera investigation to see what insurance agents say -- and - what they don't -- when they think they are alone with a senior - nbcnews.com/id/wbna24095230 - <WishList-VIDEO>
- Decided: June 28, 2017
- 2008 0413 - Tricks of the trade - A Dateline hidden camera investigation to see what insurance agents say -- and - what they don't -- when they think they are alone with a senior - nbcnews.com/id/wbna24095230 - <WishList-VIDEO>
2020s
- 2023 - LC - Primerica vs. Marco Moukhaiber - [Always Marco] --- [BonkNote]
Run – Triggers
Run – Triggers
- Can’t Say
- Crisis in Confidence
- Disintermediation
- Reputational Risk
- Interest Rates
- Plenty of things could cause another run on insurance companies.
- A devastating earnings report or financial filing could set one off.
- So could comments from public officials.
2008 1114 – NYT – What Happens When Your Insurer Goes Under?, By Ron Lieber – [link]
- 585 The consensus among industry analysts is that once confidence is lost in an insurance company like AIG, policyholders will pull their policies, insurance agents will dissuade clients from purchasing insurance policies from the company, and that, in effect, all the insurance companies would have become ”run-off” businesses.
— Panel staff conversations with industry analysts.
2010 0610 – COP – Report – The AIG Rescue, Its Impact on Markets, and the Government’s Exit Strategy – 337p
- 2011 1116 – GOV (House) – Insurance Oversight and Legislative Proposals – [PDF-131p]
- (p21) – Mr. STIVERS (R-OH) – …it seems to me that it is hard to construct a circumstance where there would be some mass run on people borrowing on their life insurance accounts.
- Can you help us, as a committee, understand your thought process there and what you were trying to build, because it really seems like the banking system would have to have collapsed or something out of that, and it just seems difficult to imagine.
- Daniel SCHWARCZ. Sure. ….people wouldn’t be doing that because they didn’t have money from banks.
- What would happen is that there would be a massive loss of confidence in a particular life insurer say, several life insurers.
- All of a sudden, big news stories broke about how they weren’t, they didn’t have money to pay claims.
- People would then worry, I am not going to get anything, I better start going and taking out my cash to the extent I can from this life insurer, and then that would be exacerbated by the fact-again, this is a potential calamitous scenario, but we need to think about it-that State guarantee funds wouldn’t potentially cover all of the exposure out there.
- So that is how it could occur.
- (p21) – Mr. STIVERS (R-OH) – …it seems to me that it is hard to construct a circumstance where there would be some mass run on people borrowing on their life insurance accounts.
- What I noticed was there is a requirement for in-force illustrations, and people may have thought they bought one thing and whenever you have to give them an in-force illustration with a current disciplined scale, they’re going to realize they bought something else.
- I think many companies will have serious problems with policyholder retention.
— Mark J. Greene, FSA. MAAA, Supervising Actuary, New York State Insurance Department
1995 – SOA – Practical Illustrations and Nonforfeiture Values, Society of Actuaries – 14p
- It was noted, though, that premium increase could lead to other policyholder actions such as increased lapses and possibly reputational risk.
2018 – IAIS – Risk-based Global Insurance Capital Standard Version 2.0 Public Consultation – 31 July 2018 – 30 October 2018 Page 69 of 158
- 4.17 Policyholder “runs” are rare in insurance, though they have occurred in the past.
- Policyholders may have incentives to run, including, but not limited to:
- (1) market movements (higher external returns, either spikes in interest rates or stock returns
could lead to higher lapse rates, while higher internal returns, such as surplus participation, could lead to lower lapse rates); - (2) personal financial distress or liquidity concerns; and
- (3) a general collapse of confidence in a company, product or industry.
- (1) market movements (higher external returns, either spikes in interest rates or stock returns
- There have also been several instances where policyholders grew concerned about the financial condition of a firm, either through regulatory action or other public knowledge about potential problems of the firm.
- These experiences did not necessarily have systemic implications, which potentially could have been caused by a variety of factors, such as regulatory intervention, the size of the insurer, or the normal economic environment.
- On the other hand, most of the runs occurred at smaller insurance companies and during a normal economic environment and it is unclear what effect they might have had during a period of significant stress.
2017 0624 – BIS / IAIS – Systemic risk from insurance product features – [link] – 26p
- Greg Gurlick (Northwestern Mutual Life) said that if consumers are not satisfied with results of their IUL policies, it will not only impact the reputations of the companies selling the products but also the entire industry will be painted with a broad brush.
2014 11/14-15 – NAIC Proc. – IULSG -Index Universal Life (IUL) Illustration (A) Subgroup
- Bank Atlantic vs. Richard X. Bove and Landenburg
- int.nyt.com/data/int-shared/nytdocs/docs/476/476.pdf
- (p199) – Deposition of Richard X. Bove
- A. She <Sheila Bair> was saying that a couple of hundred banks would fail. I thought that was totally imprudent, totally incorrect, and should not have been said.
- Q. Why was that imprudent and should not have been said?
- A. Because these are people that are supposed to make sure that banks don’t fail.
- Q. Why is it that publicly saying that all of these banks are likely to fail, why would you consider that to be imprudent?
- A. Because it creates fear.
- Q. And what is the problem of creating fear?
- A. That it causes the banking system to freeze up. It causes it causes a hording of cash, both within the financial system and outside of the financial system, and that hording of cash results in a negative impact on the economy.
- Q. All right. Then you go on to say: are no benefits by having prominent officials claiming that large financial institutions are “There failing, are insolvent, are incapable of raising funds, or that they should be allowed to fail.”
Valuation and Nonforfeiture
Valuation and Non-forfeiture
- Nonforfeiture
- Valuation
- Standard Valuation Law – SVL
- Valuation Actuary
- 1987 – SOA – Valuation Actuary Handbook – VAH
- 1987 – SOA – Valuation Actuary Handbook – VAH871 – Chapter 1 – Insurance Company Statutory Valuation, Society of Actuaries – 34p
- Valuation Manual – NAIC
- EXHIBIT ONE – History of the Standard Valuation and Nonforfeiture Laws Since NAIC Adoption in 1942, by Dan Case and Grace Dillingham, ALIA
1975-1, NAIC Proceedings
- SOA – Trowbridge Committee on Valuation and Related Matters
- 1980 – SOA – New and Proposed Valuation and Nonforfeiture Standards for Individual Insurance, Society of Actuaries – 16p
- 1981 – SOA – Effective Use of Capital, Society of Actuaries – 24p
- .. referred to the Report of the Committee on Valuation and Related Problems.
- In that report, the Trowbridge Committee identified three categories of hazards which may impair the financial health of the insurance enterprise. [C1, C2, C3]
- The report of the committee can be read by the members in Volume 5, Number 1 of the Record of the Society of Actuaries.
- 14.4 Universal Life Insurance Model Regulation
- Flexible premium products introduce special valuation problems using traditional methods in that some assumption as to future premiums is required.
- The typical “present value of future benefits less the present value of future net premiums” formula is challenging to apply to flexible premium universal life policies, since neither “future premiums” nor “future benefits” are known for any particular policy. (p323)
2018 – Book – Statutory Valuation of Individual Life and Annuity Contracts | 5th Edition — Claire, Lombardi and Summers
- APPENDIX B – AN ARGUMENT AGAINST REGULATION OF NONFORFEITURE VALUES
- The opinion that nonforfeiture benefits should be mandated was not completely unanimous among the Task Force.
- Following is a presentation by Shane Chalke to a group of economists at The Institute For Humane Studies at George Mason University on June 29, which presents the opposing view.
1989-1, NAIC Proceedings
- 10.3.1.2.2 U.S. GAAP Example – Valuation of life and other long-term insurance liabilities
- 234. For insurance liabilities that are measured under U.S. GAAP as the net present value of cash flows using current or updated assumptions, the valuation of these items should be based on the Volunteer IAIG’s reported U.S. GAAP valuations.
- 235. For insurance liabilities that are valued using historical, locked-in assumptions (e.g. long-term insurance contracts measured according to ASC 944-30-7, formerly SFAS 60) or valued under a retrospective deposit method approach (e.g. universal life insurance contracts measured according to ASC 944-30-16, formerly SFAS 97) it will be necessary to adjust the liability utilizing the Gross Premium Valuation (GPV) approach as defined in loss recognition (premium deficiency) testing under U.S. GAAP ASC Topic 944-60.
- 236. The GPV is calculated by estimating the present value of future payments for benefits and related settlement and maintenance expenses less the present value of future gross premiums based on actual and anticipated experience.
- Projections may be based on a single best estimate scenario and may also include the impact of management actions, e.g., the current estimate of future premium rate increases (see section 6.3.12 on management actions).
- Any overhead expenses would be excluded.
- The discount rate applied would be based on a current portfolio yield and expected reinvestment asset yields and cash flows. Gross rates would be reduced for expected defaults and investment expenses.
2015 – IAIS – Field Testing – Public Technical Specifications Page 54 of 230
- … referred to the Report of the Committee on Valuation and Related Problems. In that report, the Trowbridge Committee identified three categories of hazards which may impair the financial health of the insurance enterprise. [C1, C2, C3]
- The report of the committee can be read by the members in Volume 5, Number 1 of the Record of the Society of Actuaries.
1981 – SOA – Effective Use of Capital, Society of Actuaries – 24p
Rate Regulation
Rate Regulation
- Rate regulation is not an issue that pertains to the life market.
— William Fisher, ACLI / Vice President and Associate General Counsel for the Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company, on behalf of the American Council of Life Insurers
2001 0621 – GOV (House) – Insurance Product Approval: The Need for Modernization, Richard H. Baker (R-LA) – [PDF-208p, VIDEO-?]
- Commissioner David Lyons (Iowa) convened the Life Insurance (A) Committee for the purpose of conducting a hearing on the Second Standard Nonforfeiture Law for Life Insurance and the Standard Nonforfeiture Law for Deferred Annuities.
- Bill Carroll. (American Council of Life lnsurance-ACLI) said the ACLI did not believe the life insurance model should be adopted in its present form because it constituted rate regulation, especially in respect to non-traditional products, referred to as fund-based products.
- [Bonk: fund-based products ≅ Universal Life]
1994-1, NAIC Proceedings
- There is no rate regulation for life insurance companies in any State that I know of.
- Life insurance is an open competition rate, and has been very successful that way; there’s been no regulation. (p5)
— Statement of John C. Neff, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Commerce and Insurance
1985 Part 1 1116, 1223, 1230 – GOV (Senate) – The Cost and Availability of Liability Insurance for Small Business – [PDF-1163p-GooglePlay-link]
Death Master Files – DMF
Death Master Files – DMF
- 2014 0115 – NAIC – NAIC Letter to US Department of Commerce – [PDF-2p]
IIPRC – Insurance Compact
IIPRC – Insurance Compact
- IIPRC – Interstate Insurance Product Regulation Commission – Insurance Compact
- NCOIL collaborated with the NAIC and the NCSL to develop a successful Interstate Insurance Product Regulation Compact, IPRC, a speed to market vehicle for life insurance products now in force in 41 jurisdictions.
2011 0728 and 1025 – GOV (House) – Insurance Oversight: Policy Implications for U.S. Consumers, Businesses and Jobs – Part 1 (2011 0728), Part 2 (2011 1025) – [PDF-285p,
- Mary Mealer – the Product Standards Committee (PSC) Chair – <Dates?>
- Public Call Summary – April 24, 2018
2000s
- [Minutes of the Meeting of Management Committee]
- 2008 1222 – Insurance Compact – Teleconference Meeting Of The Management Committee Of The Interstate Insurance Product Regulation Commission (IIPRC) – 3p
- 2009 0223 – Insurance Compact – Teleconference Meeting Of The Management Committee Of The Interstate Insurance Product Regulation Commission (IIPRC) – 6p
2010s
- 2011 0728 and 1025 – GOV (House) – Insurance Oversight: Policy Implications for U.S. Consumers, Businesses and Jobs – Part 1 (2011 0728), Part 2 (2011 1025) – [PDF-285p,
- 2016 1130 – Consumer Protection Under Interstate Insurance Product Regulation Compact And California Insurance Law – A Comparative Study Pursuant to California Insurance Code Section 10191.5 – 12p
- 2018 1218 – Insurance Compact – Insurance Compact Product Standards Committee, Member Call Summary – 4p
- Th PSC reviewed the ACLI comments under Benefit Provisions in §3A (1) and agreed it would add clarity to include requirements for adjustable life and whole life separately:
- 2019 0219 – Insurance Compact – Product Standards Committee, Member Call Summary – 3p
2020s
- 2021 05 – Insurance Compact – Suggestions for Additional Life Uniform Standards/Provisions – Items Remaining from the 2018 List – 3p
- Insurance Compact – Product Standards Committee Call Summaries – [link]
- Product Standards Committee (PSC) –
- Member Call Summary
- Minutes of the Meeting of Management Committee
- table of death benefit factors
- Statement of Variability
- Variability of Information
- SLIMPACT Model – Lite
- SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE MULTI-STATE COMPLIANCE COMPACT
- insurancecompact.org
- insurancecompact.org/record-adopted-standards
- IIPRC-L-07-I-5 – Individual Current Assumption Whole Life Insurance Policy Standards – 35p
- These types of policies are sometimes identified as “interest sensitive life” or “fixed premium universal life”.
- Individual Non-Variable Adjustable Life Insurance Product Line
- IIPRC-L-09-I – Individual Flexible Premium Adjustable Life Insurance Policy Standards – 41p
- These standards do not apply to any life policy with a required scheduled premium, a 31-day grace period, reduced paid up, and/or extended term nonforfeiture benefits.
- These types of policies are usually identified as “current assumption whole life,” “interest sensitive whole life” or “fixed premium universal life.”
- These standards also do not address survivorship coverage, externally indexed policy features (other than with respect to a variable loan interest rate), return of premium benefits, policies with market value adjustments, or variable policies.
- IIPRC-L-09-I – Individual Flexible Premium Adjustable Life Insurance Policy Standards – 41p
- IIPRC-L-07-I-5 – Individual Current Assumption Whole Life Insurance Policy Standards – 35p
- insurancecompact.org/history
- CARFRA (Coordinated Advertising, Rate and Form Review Authority)
- 2002 12 – NAIC adopted the initial Interstate Insurance Compact Model in December 2002 with the understanding that it would be a starting point for discussion with state legislators, attorneys general, governors, and other stakeholders.
- System for Electronic Rate and Form Filing (SERFF)
- Throughout 2008, the Insurance Compact Office worked with the Members and interested parties to develop Uniform Standards through extensive public notice and participation processes. At the end of 2008, the Commission had in effect 46 Uniform Standards.
- insurancecompact.org/record-adopted-standards
- NAIC
- Speed-to-Market Working Group
- content.naic.org/sites/default/files/MO692.pdf
- insurancecompact.org/weekly_tips/cash_value_accumulation_test_(cvat)_guideline_premium_test_(gpt)_changes.htm
- The Uniform Standards for universal life products (IIPRC-L-09-I) and variable universal life products (IIPRC-L-06-I) require these products to include a table of death benefit factors used to determine compliance at issue with the CVAT or GPT. As a result of the interest rate change in Section 7702, filing companies may wish to revise the death benefit factors for UL, VUL and other products or benefits. Here are key pointers on changing death benefit factors or other CVAT/GPT details:
ABA – Activities Based Approach
ABA – Activities Based Approach
- IAIS
- FSOC, Woodall, MetLife, Congress
- 2019 – Book – Systemic Risk in the Financial Sector: Ten Years After the Great Crash
- 2019 – AP – Activities Are Not Enough!: Why Nonbank SIFI Designations Are Essential to Prevent Systemic Risk, Daniel Schwarcz, Jeremy Kress, Patricia McCoy – 19p
- Liquidity Risk
- 44. If the public becomes concerned about the viability of a particular business model or widely-held asset class, insurers could collectively be forced to liquidate assets in a stressed environment to meet the resulting withdrawals, termination of short-term funding arrangements or collateral/margin calls.
2017 1208 – IAIS – Interim Consultation Paper on ABA, Comments due by 15 February 2018 – 62p
ESG – Economic Scenario Generator
ESG – Economic Scenario Generator
- Academy’s Economic Scenario Generator Work Group
- 16. Discussed the ESG Implementation Timeline and Overview of Treasury Model
- Pat Allison (NAIC) reviewed the implementation timeline for the economic scenario generator (ESG) (Attachment TwentyFive).
- She noted that the first three milestones have been completed and reminded the audience that the presentation given to the Task Force and the Life Risk-Based Capital (E) Working Group on Oct. 27 is posted on the groups’ web pages
2020 Fall – NAIC – LIFE ACTUARIAL (A) TASK FORCE – 247p
Moral Hazard
Moral Hazard
- Financial Crisis
- We argue that changes in the life insurance industry have created a nontrivial moral hazard.
- We document the industry’s shift from sales of life insurance to sales of mainly rate-of-return oriented investments like single premium deferred annuities (SPDAs) and guaranteed investment contracts (GICs).
1992 – FRB-Minneapolis – SPDAs and GICs: Like Money in the Bank?, by Neil Wallace and Richard M. Todd, Federal Reserve of Minneapolis – 18p
- If you go too far in insuring or regulating, what you create is a moral hazard where the market participants themselves don’t worry about the risks being taken, because they expect “Uncle Sugar” to bail them out. (p34)
— Edward C. Ettin
2006 0310 – FRB – Federal Reserve Board Oral History Project – Interview with Edward C. Ettin, Former Deputy Director, Division of Research and Statistics – 57p