NCOIL – National Council of Insurance Legislators

  • Sen. Hackett (R-OH) –  stated that one of the problems that the life insurance industry has been experiencing for several years is that when universal life was sold years ago interest rates were so much higher and these policies are really going to blow up much earlier.  (p165)

2020 12 – NCOIL – 30 Day Materials and Tentative General Schedule, NCOIL Annual Meeting, December 9 – 12, 2020 – 220p 

  • State insurance regulation was not a factor in the economic downturn and should not be swept into any proposed financial services overhaul.

2009 0402 – Letter – NCOIL to GOV (Senators Dodd, Frank, Shelby, Bachus) – 2p

  • 2017 0306 – InsuranceJournal – At NCOIL, State Lawmakers Look to Claw Back Power from NAIC, By Ian Adams – [link]
    • 2018 – LR – Is U.S. Insurance Regulation Unconstitutional?, by Daniel Schwarcz – 67p
  • 2003 1105 – GOV (House) – Reforming Insurance Regulation: Making the Marketplace More Competitive for Consumers, Richard H. Baker (R-LA) – [PDF-200p, VIDEO-?] 
    • NCOIL – Neil Breslin, Senator, New York State, on behalf of the National Conference of Insurance Legislator
  • 2007 1030 – GOV (House) – Additional Perspectives on the Need for Insurance Regulatory Reform, Paul Kanjorski (D-PA)  —  [BonkNote] 
    • NCOIL – Craig Eiland, Texas House of Representatives, on behalf of the National Conference of Insurance Legislators
  • 2008 0610 – GOV (House) – H.R. 5840, The Insurance Information Act of 2008, Paul Kanjorski (D-PA)  —  [BonkNote]
    • (p14) – NCOIL – Brian P. Kennedy, Representative, Rhode Island House of Representatives, and President, National Conference of Insurance Legislators
  • Tony Higgins (N.C.) referred the group to a resolution of the National Conference of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL) urging state insurance departments to become aware of disclosure and abuse issues in life insurance solicitation (Attachment Six-A2).
  • 1993-3, NAIC Proceedings – 1992 0724 – Letter – NCOIL to State Governors – Re: Full Disclosure/No Misleading Advertising in the Sale of Life Insurance, Attachment Six-A2 – [link-pic]
    • To encourage full disclosure and combat misleading advertising in the sale of life insurance, the Executive Committee of NCOIL urges that state insurance departments:
      • (1) Require full disclosure of withdrawal charges and actual pure net interest when interest rates are used to advertise and sell life company products;
      • (2) Stay alert and keep ongoing records to review insurance companies and agents who have complaints filed against them regarding life insurance replacement; 
      • (3) Review their existing statutes and regulations and to the extent possible, make companies and agents aware of those existing statutes and regulations with regard to false or misleading advertising in the sale of life insurance policies.

1993-3, NAIC Proceedings 

  • 2008 1120 – NCOIL – Life Insurance & Financial Planning Committee Minutes – National Conference of Insurance Legislators – 6p
    • PRINCIPLES-BASED RESERVING
    • Commissioner Voss said the NAIC Life, Health, and Actuarial Task Force (LHATF) was nearing completion of a new Standard Valuation Law.
      • She said certain types of new life insurance products, like level premium term life insurance, universal life insurance with secondary guarantees, and variable annuities with secondary guarantees were often under-reserved, while other life insurance products were required to maintain redundant reserves.
      • Adoption of a new principles-based system of reserve standards would, she said, allow companies to maintain reserves that represented their actual risk.
      • Commissioner Voss said the NAIC hoped to complete the Standards Valuation Law by year-end.
    • Dave Sandberg with the American Academy of Actuaries (AAA) … said companies in Australia, the United Kingdom, and Canada were subject to principles-based reserving requirements, and had remained solvent despite the far-reaching impacts of a global credit crisis.
      • He said the current reserving requirements in the United States hid the real risks. 

More complex products sold to individual consumers (e.g., universal life policies) tend to generate more market conduct problems than simple products (e.g., term life insurance).

2003 0701 – Report – For NCOIL – The Path to Reform – The Evolution of Market Conduct Surveillance Regulation, by PricewaterhouseCoopers and Georgia State University – 117p

  • (p6) – I do note that on reinsurance issues, there does need to be a national debate on what we do with reinsurance issues.
  • We have been discussing this along with NAIC, and there are very technical, detailed things that have to happen on a worldwide basis, not just what we do.

—  Craig Eiland, Texas House of Representatives, on behalf of the National Conference of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL)

2007 1030 – GOV (House) – Additional Perspectives on the Need for Insurance Regulatory Reform, Paul Kanjorski (D-PA)  —  [BonkNote]

Wisconsin

  • 2018 – Wisconsin OCI – Wisconsin Insurance Report – 219p
    • (p90) – Complaints and inquiries related to life insurance and annuity products … generally concerned consumer dissatisfaction with, or confusion regarding, universal life insurance policies.
  • 2021 1203 – Wisconsin OCI – Consumer Alert related to Universal Life Insurance – [link] – 2p
    • To: Licensed Intermediaries, Employers, Associations and Interested Parties
    • From: Mark V. Afable, Commissioner of Insurance
    • The insurance industry generally categorizes whole life and universal life insurance as “permanent” life insurance. A “permanent” policy is designed to provide coverage for your entire life if sufficient premiums are paid.
    • The main expense of a universal life policy is the cost of insurance charge.  The cost of insurance charge is the amount you must pay the insurance company to fund the policy’s death benefit.  
    • Many consumers set up their policies for level payments when they purchase the policy based on assumptions at the time of sale.
      • `These assumptions include cost of insurance rates and interest rates (or investment returns).
      • If charges increase or interest rates decrease, the cash value may not be sufficient to cover the costs of the contract over time, and additional premiums may be required later to keep the ​contract in force.
    • The Office of the Commissioner of Insurance has seen many cases of consumers who purchased universal life insurance and who made payments for years thinking their premium payment would not change or that their coverage would remain in effect. But many found that their policies had lapsed (were no longer in effect) with little to no value or they were required to pay large additional premium payments to keep their coverage in effect.
  • Sean Duffy (R-WI)
    • 2011-2019 – US Congress
  • Stanley C. DuRose
    • 1969-1975 – Wisconsin Insurance Commissioner – 1969-
    • 1973 0221 and 0222 – Part 2 of 4  —  [BonkNote-Part 2 of 4]  —  [PDF-733p-GooglePlay]
      • 1973 / 1974 – GOV (Senate) – The Life Insurance Industry, Senator Hart (D-MI) – 4 Parts — [BonkNote]
  • Bradford S. Gile
  • Dave Heineck (Wis.)
    • 1988-2, NAIC Proceedings
  • Spencer Kimball
    • UW-Law School
  • Susan Mitchell – Wisconsin Insurance Commissioner
    • 1981 – LC – Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Mitchell, 101 Wis. 2d 90, 303 N.W.2d 639 (1981). 

      • GoogleScholar – [link]
      • 1981 – ACLI Amicus Curiae Brief – Aetna v Mitchell (WI Insurance Commissioner) – 32p 
  • William Proxmire (D-WI)
    • 1957-1989 – US Senator
  • Kim Shaul
    • 2010 1014 FCIC staff audiotape of interview with Kim Shaul, Wisconsin Office of the Commissioner of Insurance_1.wma
      • monolines – Ambac
      • <WishList> – Letter / Form from Wisconsin Insurance Commissioner re: ok for Ambac… Date-?
  • Richard M. Snell
    • Insurance Department – Actuary?
    • Northwestern Mutual
  • Richard Wicka
  • One thought about the Moss Report is that requiring that costs for both term and whole life be provided when selling insurance products does not seem right in the American marketplace.
  • If the agent wants to do it voluntarily, that is one thing, but to have it mandated, seems to be against our way of marketing products.

—  William M. Snell, Northwestern Mutual Life and Chairman of the Wisconsin Task Force

1979 – SOA – Cost Disclosure (Moss Report), Society of Actuaries – 18p

  • Any administrative rule requiring dissemination of cost disclosure information that is misleading due to incompleteness is beyond the scope of the insurance commissioner’s authority in that it violates sub. (1) (a).

1981 – LC – Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Mitchell, 101 Wis. 2d 90, 303 N.W.2d 639  —  [BonkNote]

  • GoogleScholar – [link]
  • 1980 – SOA – The Wisconsin Imbroglio, The Actuary, Society of Actuaries – 3p
    • William M. Snell, Bradley Giles, Ernest J. Moorhead, Paul J. Overberg
  • 1981 – ACLI – Amicus Curiae Brief – Aetna v Mitchell (WI Insurance Commissioner) – 32p 
  • SUBJECT: Wisconsin’s Approach to the Regulation of Insurance Company Investments  – ATTACHMENT ONE-A1
    • TO: Prudent Person Model Investment Law Working Group
    • FROM: Wisconsin Office of the Commissioner of Insurance
    • DATE: April 17, 1996
  • The Wisconsin approach to the regulation of insurance company investments, while very different from the pending model and the concept drafts under review by this working group, has been very successful for Wisconsin.
  • No domestic insurer has suffered investment-related insolvency since this approach was adopted in 1971.
  • We appreciate this opportunity to explain the methods Wisconsin has employed to achieve these results and our observations as to why this success was possible. (p564)

1996-1, NAIC Proceedings

  • 2009 1023 – InvestmentNews – Insurance advocates laud changes to Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act – [link]
    • Members of the insurance industry are applauding an amendment to the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act of 2009 that eliminates a section that would have given the agency oversight of some insurance products.
    • “We simply do not need to institute duplicative policies,” Ms. Moore said in a statement. “Furthermore, this bill is not intended to regulate insurers; it is meant to protect consumers in their relationships with lenders and credit providers.”
    • Whit Cornman, spokesman for the American Council of Life Insurers, also hailed the changes.
      • “We have always maintained that for the life insurance industry, effective consumer protections require that solvency regulation and product design reside with the same regulator,” he said.
      • “Rep. Moore’s amendment is recognition of this need and of the protections that are already in place for life insurance consumers.”

WISCONSIN-Appointed, at the Pleasure of the Governor

Commissioner of Insurance Mark Afable 1/22/2019 incumbent
Commissioner of Insurance Ted Nickel 1/5/2011 1/7/2019 8 0
Commissioner of Insurance Sean Dilweg 1/1/2007 1/3/2011 4 0
Commissioner of Insurance Jorge Gomez 2/17/2003 1/1/2007 3 11
Acting Commissioner of Insurance Randy Blumer 1/1/2003 2/17/2003 0 1
Commissioner of Insurance Connie O’Connell 1/4/1999 1/1/2003 4 0
Acting Commissioner of Insurance Randy Blumer 1/6/1998 1/1/1999 1 0
Commissioner of Insurance Josephine W. Musser 3/1/1993 12/19/1997 4 9
Commissioner of Insurance No Record in Proceedings 12/1/1992 3/1/1993 0 3
Commissioner of Insurance Robert D. Haase 3/1/1987 12/1/1992 5 9
Commissioner of Insurance Thomas P. Fox 3/1/1983 3/1/1987 4 0
Commissioner of Insurance Ann J. Haney 7/1/1982 3/1/1983 0 8
Commissioner of Insurance Susan Mitchell 3/1/1979 7/1/1982 3 4

Commissioner of Insurance Harold R. Wilde, Jr. 6/1/1975 3/1/1979 3 9  – Naperville Notables: Hal Wilde – [VIDEO-YouTube]

Commissioner of Insurance Stanley C. DuRose 6/1/1969 6/1/1975 6 0
Commissioner of Insurance Robert D. Haase 6/1/1965 6/1/1969 4 0
  • [Bonk: Buyer’s Guide – Wisconsin used NAIC 1982 copy as a template somehow, which apparently doesn’t exist. – email]

1906 0517 – Boston Evening Transcript – New Insurance Sensation –  (Boston, Massachusetts) Newspapers.com

1909 0203 – The Daily Tribune – New Insurance Sensation –  (Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin) Newspapers.com

New York

  • Mark J. Greene, FSA. MAAA, Supervising Actuary, New York State Insurance Department
    • What I noticed was there is a requirement for in-force illustrations, and people may have thought they bought one thing and whenever you have to give them an in-force illustration with a current disciplined scale, they’re going to realize they bought something else.
    • I think many companies will have serious problems with policyholder retention.

1995 – SOA – Practical Illustrations and Nonforfeiture Values, Society of Actuaries – 14p

  • New York reports that they have determined that Section 216 and 208, (a) and (b), and perhaps other sections of their law, prohibit the issuance of universal life type products.
  • Their law is currently being amended to permit such policies.

1982-2, NAIC Proceedings

  • The New York Department of financial services recently issued a Consumer Alert on Universal Life Insurance. (See copy attached.) – (p83-85) or dfs.ny.gov/consumers/alerts/universal_life_insurance
  • The Consumer Alert explains universal life insurance products and alerts consumers that their premium amounts may increase.

2019 0328 – CEFLI – CEFLI Compliance & Ethics Committee Meeting – 87p

  • Congress
  • Gary Ackerman (D-NY)
    • 1983-2013 – US House
  • Carolyn Maloney (D-NY)
    • 1993-2023 – US House
  • Chauncey Depew (R-NY)
    • 1899-1911 – US Senator
    • 1906 0312 – San Francisco Call – Senator Depew in Sanitarium – [link]
      • It was hinted tonight that the Senator’s Breakdown, said to be the first in his life, was caused by the widespread adverse criticism directed against him, following the exposure of the insurance scandal.

      • The effect of the insurance disclosures on President Alexander of the Equitable and President McCall of the New York Life, both of whom suffered mental breakdown, caused the friends of Senator Depew to tear that he had become the victim of a similar affliction.

  • Sue Kelly (R-NY)
    • 1995-2007 – US House
    • 2001 0516 – GOV (House) – NARAB And Beyond, Richard Baker (R-LA) – [PDF-79p, VIDEO-?] – Sue Kelly (R-NY) Letter – 3p
  • John LaFalce (D-NY)
    • 1975-2003 – US House
      • 1987-1995 – Chairman of the House Small Business Committee
      • 1999-2003 – Ranking Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee 
  • Charles Rangel (D-NY)
    • 1971-2017 – US House
      • Executive Life Insurance Failure, Charles B. Rangel (D-NY)  —  [BonkNote]
  • Chuck Schumer (D-NY)
    • 1999-Current (as of 2023) – US Senator
    • IndyMac
  • Edolphus Towns (D-NY)
    • 1983-2013 – US House
      • 2009-2011 – Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee 
  • Insurance Commissioners
  • dfs.ny.gov/reports_and_publications/annual_reports/annual_reports_archive
  • George W. Miller:  ?-1871-?
    • 1872 – New York State – GOV – Report and Testimony of the Committee on Insurance on Resolution of the Assembly, to Investigate Into the Conduct of George W. Miller, Superintendent of the Insurance Department, Relative to His Receiving Fees and Perquisites for His Use and Emolument, Etc – [PDF-143p-GooglePlay]
  • Robert Dineen: 1943-1950
    • Robert Dineen Award
    • 1958 – NAIC – Insurance Regulation in the Public Interest “A BETTER N.A.I.C.” – by Robert E. Dineen – 122p
  • James P. Corcoran:  3/9/1983 1/26/1990 
  • Salvatore R. Curiale: 7/1/1990 12/31/1994
  • Edward J. Muhl – 1995 0214 -1996 1229
  • Neil Levin – 1997-2001 
  • Gregory V. Serio: 4/5/2001-1/17/2005
  • Eric R. Dinallo: 1/29/2007 7/3/2009
  • Benjamin M. Lawsky: 10/3/2011 – 6/1/2015
    • 2014 – NYSID – Regulating In An Evolving Financial Landscape, by Ben Lawsky – 21p-<Bad Link> 
    • 2013 06 – NYSID – Shining a Light on Shadow Insurance: A Little-known Loophole That Puts Insurance Policyholders and Taxpayers at Greater Risk, by Ben Lawsky – 24p
  • Linda Lacewell:
    • 2019 0221 – New York – Department of Financial Services – Consumer Alert – Acting DFS Superintendent Lacewell Issues Consumer Alert Regarding Universal Life Policies: DFS Urges New Yorkers to Carefully Review Their Policies and All Information Provided by Their Insurer – [link]
      • 2019 0222 – ThinkAdvisor – New York Financial Superintendent Lacewell Warns of Hidden Costs in Universal Life Policies, By Elizabeth Festa – [link]
  • Anthony J. Albanese:  6/1/2015 11/30/2015
    • 2010 0629 – LC – Transatlantic vs AIG – Affirmation of Anthony J. Albanese – 116p
      • 78. AIG Investments senior executive and then-AIG Chief Investment Officer Win Neuger was instrumental in the decision.
      • As reported by the Wall Street Journal on February 5, 2009, “Mr. Neuger and Kevin McGinn, who has been AIG’s chief credit officer since 2004, signed off on the proposal, agreeing in a memo that the guidelines didn’t subject the [Program] portfolio to undue risk.”

  • Terrance Lennon
    • Terry Lennon, executive vice president, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, who launched MetLife’s mergers and acquisition (M&A) department in 1994.
      • 1999 – SOA – ‘Biggest by a mile’ Megamergers’ 1998 peaks signal trends for actuaries (p1), act9902 – Society of Actuaries – 15p
  • New York Insurance Regulation 210
  • … went into effect in New York on March 19, 2018.
  • … establishes standards for the determination and any readjustment of non-guaranteed elements (“NGEs”) that may vary at the insurer’s discretion for life insurance policies and annuity contracts delivered or issued for delivery in New York.
    • Examples of NGEs include cost of insurance for universal life insurance policies, as well as interest crediting rates for annuities and universal life insurance policies.
  • The regulation requires insurers to notify policyholders at least 60 days in advance of any change in NGEs that is adverse to policyholders and, with respect to life insurance, to notify the NYDFS at least 120 days prior to any such changes.
  • Additionally, the regulation requires insurers to file annually with NYDFS to inform the NYDFS of any changes adverse to policyholders made in the prior year.
  • The regulation generally prohibits insurers from increasing profit margins for in-force policies or adjusting NGEs in order to recoup past losses.

2018 1231 – Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Form 10-K, For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 – sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/937834/000093783419000006/mlic-12312018x10k.htm

  • Life insurance is especially an outgrowth of public confidence in the good management and integrity of officers and directors, and anything which shocks this faith on the part of policy-holders is vastly detrimental to the interests of a company.

1872 – New York State – GOV – Report and Testimony of the Committee on Insurance on Resolution of the Assembly, to Investigate Into the Conduct of George W. Miller, Superintendent of the Insurance Department, Relative to His Receiving Fees and Perquisites for His Use and Emolument, Etc – [GooglePlay-link]

  • Chapter 1, Life Insurance and the Question of Solvency Salvatore R. Curiale, Superintendent of Insurance, New York State Insurance Department
  • I am not sure there are any serious issues confronting the life insurance industry these days, unless of course you consider solvency, liquidity, junk bonds, deteriorating mortgage and real estate portfolios, risk-based capital requirements, asset mix, separate accounts, credit risk, Congressional inquiries, shrinking surplus, demutualization and more.
  • ⇒  What happened?
  • ⇒  How did a boring, straight-forward business become so interesting and so difficult to regulate?
  • During the past decade the life insurance industry has undergone dramatic changes.
    • A business that was  previously characterized by stable risks and generous profits has been transformed into one marked by instability of risk and evaporating profit margins.
  • The change was precipitated by the dramatic rise in interest rates in the late 1970s and early 1980s.
    • The relatively high rates offered by money market funds, Certificates of Deposit and other similar products prompted insurers to develop insurance alternatives that shifted the marketing emphasis from security to, at least partially, rate of return.
1993 – Book – Financial Management of Life Insurance Companies, edited by J. David Cummins
  • 2000 0616 – NYSID – Letter from Rochelle Katz, Associate Att’y, State of N.Y. Ins. Dep’t, to Bertil Lundqvist, Att’y, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP (June 16, 2000) (on file with the N.Y. Dept. of Ins. Gen. Counsel). / NYSID Letter to Starr International Inc.  Regarding Credit Default Option Facility – 2p
    • 2015 – LR – Systemic Risk Oversight and the Shifting Balance of State and Federal Authority over Insurance, by Patricia A. McCoy – 56p-ssrn.com-link 
    • 2008 0922 – NYSID – RE: “Best practices” for financial guaranty insurers.
      • Although OGC’s June 16, 2000 opinion suggests that a CDS is not an insurance contract if the payment by the protection buyer is not conditioned upon an actual pecuniary loss, that opinion did not grapple with whether, under Insurance Law § 1101, a CDS is an insurance contract when it is purchased by a party who, at the time at which the agreement is entered into, holds, or reasonably expects to hold, a “material interest” in the referenced obligation. 
      • That omission will be rectified and addressed in a forthcoming opinion to be prepared by OGC.
      • 2008 0922 – NYSID – Circular Letter No. 19, TO: All authorized financial guaranty insurers, RE: “Best practices” for financial guaranty insurers
        • III. REGULATION OF FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURERS
          • The regulation of FGIs in New York is principally governed by Article 69 of the Insurance Law, which applies exclusively to FGIs. Article 69 sets forth a series of specialized and highly technical requirements intended to safeguard the financial solvency of FGIs authorized to do business in this State.
          • These include:
  • 2008 0916 – Reuters – In November 2008, Treasury used funding from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to inject $40 billion into AIG. – [link]
  • Deputy Commissioner said New York would vote “No” on this guideline.
    • We acknowledge this is a small step in the right direction but feel it falls short of the standard we should impose to ensure consumers are protected.
    • We believe this proposal continues to allow the use of unrealistic and unreasonable crediting rates.
    • Illustrations are supposed to show consumers how an insurance product works and is expected to perform in the future.
    • We know insurers have used these illustrations to compete with each other and to sell equity indexed life insurance products by using unrealistic growth cash values.
    • This misleads consumers.
    • This causes consumers harm.
    • We feel it is critically important for the NAIC to advocate for more realistic and reasonable credit rates and we don’t believe this proposal achieves that.” (3-6)

2020 Summer – NAIC Proceedings

  • Sometimes it is the same with insurance departments.
    • If you like the idea, go ahead and do it.
    • I think that is what the New York State Insurance Department (the Department) did with Regulation 126, and I think that that is what the Department is doing with Regulation 130 regarding investments in high-yield, high-risk obligations by domestic life insurance companies. [Junk Bonds]

—  Robert J. Callahan, Fellow of the Society and has been with the New York State Insurance Department for over 35 years.

1987 – SOA – Quantifying The C-1 Risk (Defaults in Fixed Dollar Investments and Market Value Changes in Equity Investments), rsa87v13n320 –  Society of Actuaries – 32p

  • (p1177) – By Mr. MCGUIRE:
    • A. I have parted with two or three life insurance policies.
    • Q. Sell them for the amount of the loan, or at a discount?
    • A. at the price the insurance company would pay for them.
    • By Mr. TRACY : Q. That is what is called “surrendered value?”
      • A. Yes, sir.

1877 0723 – New York Senate – Testimony Taken Before the Senate Committee on Charges Against De Witt O. Ellis, Superintendent of the Banking Department – [PDF-1557p-GooglePlay]

  • 1983 – Temporary State Commission on Banking, Insurance and Financial Services <Cuomo / Deregulation/ Dewind Commission Report/Orin Kramer>
    • Public papers of Governor Mario M. Cuomo, 1983 – New York
  • 1998 0325 – The Feeling’s Not Mutual: An Analysis of Governor Pataki’s Proposed Mutual Holding Company Legislation. Report by the Assembly Standing Committee on Insurance – assembly.state.ny.us/Reports/Ins/199803/
  • 2002 – Public hearing, investing in New York the role of insurance company capital in New York communities by New York (State). Legislature. Assembly….  149p-nysl.ptfs.com/#!/s?a=c&q=*&type=16&criteria=field11%3D50156174&b=0
  • 2004 – What Ever Happened To The New York Insurance Exchange (And Why Do We Care)?, by Peter H. Bickford – 29p
  • 2008 1010 – Circular Letter No. 22 – [link] – <Bad Link>
    • Misrepresentations or misleading statements regarding AIG insurance company subsidiaries in New York-or other insurers- aimed at causing fear or undue concern amongst insurance consumers will compel the Department to take appropriate disciplinary or other regulatory action against any person violating the Insurance Law and regulations thereunder.
  • 2022 1005 – NYDFS – Special Considerations Relating to December 31, 2022 Reserves and Other Solvency Issues – 18p – <Bad Link>
  • Armand M. de Palo: This is more of just a comment than a question.
    • As many of you know, New York State does intend to adopt regulations quite like the Model law.
    • In New York State, Regulation 74 governs illustrations.

1996 – SOA – Update on Life Insurance Illustrations, Society of Actuaries – 24p

  • “LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK”
  • Merritt Committee Report Joint Legislative Committee in New York 
  • New York Liquidation Bureau – nylb.org/
  • OCC – Report of the State of New York Banking Department Superintendent’s Advisory Committee on Transnational Banking Institutions**— Summary of Recommendations, by John Heinmann
  • dfs.ny.gov/industry_guidance/ins_regs_by_part_number
  • 2604 –  CHAPTER 28, ARTICLE 26, Section 2694 – False statements as to insurers, New York Consolidated Laws, Insurance Law – [link]
    • § 2604. False statements as to insurers.
    • No person shall either
      • (i) wilfully make, circulate or transmit to another any statement written, printed or by word of mouth, which is untrue in fact and is directly or by inference derogatory to the financial condition, or affects the solvency or financial standing, of any insurer doing business in this state, or
      • (ii) knowingly counsel, aid, procure or induce another to start, transmit or circulate any such statement.
  • New York Liquidation Bureau – [link]
  • Regulations
  • Universal Life
    • Withdrawn Circular Letters
      • 1980-18 – 12/19/80 –
        • Guidelines for submission and approval of life insurance policies with projected indeterminate or adjustable premium rates less than or equal to maximum guaranteed premium rates. – [link]
      • 1983-4 – 3/16/83 – Guidelines for submission and approval of “Universal Life” and other life policies  subject to Sections 4232(b) or 4518 of the Insurance Law <1983 #4 – off website> – [link]
      • 1983 #8 – <Not on Website.  I have.>

Phoenix Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. INSURANCE DEPT., ETC., 500 F. Supp. 2 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)

US District Court for the Southern District of New York – 500 F. Supp. 2 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)
March 31, 1980
  • Shopping Guide
  • Adjusted Indexes
  • Virginia Knauer
  • Low-Cost
  • OGC Op. No. 07-08-11 – RE: Individual Life Insurance, Sales Illustrations and Insurer Restrictions on Agents – [link]
  • The Office of General Counsel issued the following opinion on August 29, 2007 representing the position of the New York State Insurance Department.
    • Questions Presented:
      • 1. Do the illustrations currently used by life insurers adequately inform prospective insureds of the cost of individual insurance policies?
    • Conclusions:
      • 1. Yes, in the Insurance Department’s estimation, the illustrations as required by N. Y. Ins. Law § 3209 (McKinney 2006) and detailed in N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 11, Sub-Parts 53-2 & 53-3 (Regulation 74) adequately inform prospective insureds of the comparative cost of various individual life insurance policies.
  • OGC Op. No. 06-05-10 – Re: Policy or contract and company comparisons in sale and replacement of life insurance and annuities – [link]
  • The Office of General Counsel issued the following opinion on May 30, 2006, representing the position of the New York State Insurance Department.
  • Question Presented:
    • What New York laws and regulations apply to policy or contract and company comparisons in the sale and replacement of life insurance policies and annuity contracts?
  • NEW YORK-Appointed, at the Pleasure of the Governor
    • Acting Superintendent of Fin. Srvs. Linda A. Lacewell 2/4/2019 incumbent
    • Superintendent of Financial Services Maria T. Vullo 6/15/2016 2/1/2019 2 8
    • Acting Superintendent of Insurance Maria T. Vullo 2/23/2016 6/15/2016 0 4
    • Acting Superintendent of Insurance Shirin Emami 12/1/2015 2/1/2016 0 2
    • Acting Superintendent of Insurance Anthony Albanese 6/1/2015 11/30/2015 0 5
    • Superintendent of Financial Services Benjamin M. Lawsky 10/3/2011 6/1/2015 3 8
    • Superintendent of Insurance James J. Wrynn 9/11/2009 10/3/2011 2 1
    • Acting Superintendent of Insurance James J. Wrynn 8/20/2009 9/11/2009 0 1
    • Acting Superintendent of Insurance Kermitt J. Brooks 7/4/2009 8/18/2009 0 1
    • Superintendent of Insurance Eric R. Dinallo 1/29/2007 7/3/2009 2 6
    • Acting Superintendent of Insurance Louis W. Pietroluongo 1/1/2007 1/28/2007 0 1
    • Superintendent of Insurance Howard D. Mills III 5/18/2005 12/31/2006 1 7
    • Superintendent of Insurance No Record in Proceedings 1/18/2005 5/17/2005 0 4
    • Superintendent of Insurance Gregory V. Serio 5/9/2001 1/17/2005 3 9
    • Acting Superintendent of Insurance Gregory V. Serio 4/5/2001 5/9/2001 0 1
    • Superintendent of Insurance Neil D. Levin 4/7/1997 4/5/2001 4 0
    • Superintendent of Insurance No Record in Proceedings 1/1/1997 4/6/1997 0 3
    • Superintendent of Insurance Edward J. Muhl 2/14/1995 12/29/1996 1 10
    • Superintendent of Insurance Salvatore R. Curiale 7/1/1990 12/31/1994 4 5
    • Acting Superintendent of Insurance Wendy Cooper 1/27/1990 7/1/1990 0 6
    • Superintendent of Insurance James P. Corcoran 3/9/1983 1/26/1990 6 10
    • Superintendent of Insurance Albert B. Lewis 1/5/1978 3/7/1983 5 2

timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1945/11/15/issue.html

  • 1878 – GOV (New York) – Testimony Taken Before the Senate Committee on Banks and the …, Volume 3, By De Witt C. Ellis, New York (State) Legislative Committee on Banks – [PDF-681p-GooglePlay]
    • (p1757-1758) – In the State of Massachusetts, three years ago, there was a life insurance company.
      • It was being attacked; wreckers were after it.
    • The confidence of the people in it was being undermined; and it looked as though the company was bound to go into the bands of a receiver.
    • What does the Superintendent of the Insurance Department do there? Go down and examine it and on finding a deficiency of assets, pass it over into the hands of a receiver to be crushed?
    • On the other hand, looking over the broad field, he takes the insurance company under his hand, nurses it, carries it along; and today it stands as one of the most prominent institutions of the kind in the State of Massachusetts, saved, and the policyholders saved, and the insurance interest of the State saved by just that kind of policy.
    • And two weeks ago in the State of Connecticut, what occured relative to another insurance company?
      • On examination it was found there was a deficiency of assets from $1,000,000 to $4,000,000, and yet what does the department of that State, in conjunction with the Supreme Court, do in the matter of the supervision of that company?
        • Does it pass it over into the hands of a receiver? If it had been done, the policyholders would not have received twenty-five cents on the dollar.
          • Not at all; but the broad, liberal, charitable view was taken.
        • The State department of Connecticut, in conjunction with the Supreme Court, put new men in charge of it, and the company promises to go on to success.
      • It certainly will unless outside influences are brought to bear against it to undermine and crush it.
    • (p1793) – Take the case, as a further illustration, of insurance companies.
      • There have been failures of small insurance companies within the past few years, and the confidence of the public has been badly shattered in connection with them.
      • Suppose, a few years ago, the larger insurance companies, realizing the rocks that were lying ahead, had joined together, and taken up these smaller ones and gone on, the confidence of the public would have remained in the insurance interest, policyholders would have been protected, and the policyholders in these larger companies would have been uninjured, how much better would it have been for the insurance interest?