Collaboration
- But nowhere has there been a serious, full dress attempt to re-define the modern American insurance transaction as a sui generis matter.
- Perhaps the job is too big, or too dull.
- [Bonk: sui generis = unique]
1950 - LR -The Special Nature of the Insurance Contract: A Few Suggestion for Further Study, by Franklin M. Schultz - 15p
56. No single information system can provide all the relevant information. (p406)
2009 - United Nations - Report of the Commission of Experts of the President of the United Nations General Assembly on reforms of the International Monetary and Financial System - (interim draft) - 607p
- Director Cameron asked whether CIPR developed resources for producers to use that could help explain complex products.
- Mr. Karapiperis said that was not a current focus of CIPR.
2018-3, NAIC Proc.
- Mr. Gendron said the Center for Insurance Policy and Research (CIPR) is looking to facilitate communication with academics on consumer issues, from both a risk management perspective and a consumer understanding perspective; it could also inform the disclosures contemplated in Model #245. (p16)
2019 0824 - NAIC Life Insurance and Annuities, National Meeting - Summer
- We are a research body and an education body to help educate the public on why these are not guarantees, and how they should be looking at these in terms of flexibility.
- I'm not talking about numbers now.
- I'm talking about perceptions and concepts regarding the nonguaranteed elements of a contract.
-- Barbara J. Lautzenheiser
1992 - SOA - Life Insurance Sales Illustrations, Society of Actuaries - 16p
- 6. NAIC/North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) Enforcement Coordination Subgroup
- Mr. Nevrla suggested the group solicit speakers from the industry as they are the experts in some of the products and how they work.
- Mr. Nevrla suggested insurance and security regulators have a greater need to understand how variable annuities and actuarial science work so both groups of regulators can work closer together. (p553)
2005-1, NAIC Proceedings
- Statement of Stephen G. Kellison, Executive Director Of The American Academy Of Actuaries To The NAIC Technical Services Ex5 Subcommittee
- The purpose of this statement is to speak in favor of establishment of a more organized coordination between the NAIC and the actuarial profession.
- The American Academy of Actuaries is the public interface organization for the actuarial profession in the U.S. and includes actuaries in all areas of specialization within its membership.
- The balance of this statement discusses ways of achieving stronger liaison.
1985-1B, NAIC Proceedings - 1984 1212 - AAA - The NAIC And The Actuarial Profession - Attachment Three - American Academy of Actuaries
- In addition to our education system, the body of actuarial knowledge itself needs the nutrition that the academic world can supply.
- Academics look at problems differently than those of us in the practical world, and that difference in perspective can supplement, in a healthy way, the growth and evolution of the basic subject.
1986 - SOA - Richard S. Robertson, Address of the President, Society of Actuaries: The Sad State of Actuarial Education in the United States - 6p
- University of Michigan - Industry Partnership Program (IPP)
- sites.lsa.umich.edu/actuarial-ipp/
- https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/actuarial-ipp/wp-content/uploads/sites/445/2016/10/ARC-Presentation.pdf
- Society of Actuaries
- Center for Actuarial Excellence Education Grant
- The first step the industry has to take is to recognize the things that we have debated.
- These are all controversial questions and we cannot deal with them as if we are sheep without a bellwether.
- There is bound to be a controversial element in anything that enlightens the public to these differences and gives them a more intelligent basis for choice than they have at the present time.
- As long as we are committed institutionally to unity, we are unlikely to be able to take the first necessary step.
- .....start to announce more steadily and more clearly that these differences do exist.....
-- E. J. Moorhead
1977 - SOA - Debate: "Resolved... The Life Insurance Business, As Transacted Today, Is In Its Terminal Stages, Society of Actuaries - 14p
- Remarks Made By Hon. William Barnes (New York Insurance Commissioner from 1860 to 1870) - (p149 / 177)
- I am very much delighted, Mr. Chairman, to find this contrariety of views among the gentlemen assembled here from the twenty-one different states.
- Although it may not seem to be exactly in the process toward harmony to commend dissimilar views; but I have no doubt that it is the precise road to harmony.
- Albert Paine (Maine Insurance Commissioner) - (p13/ 44)
- We are here, as I understand it, as the friends of the companies, and as the friends of the public, and if there is any conflict between the companies and the public, I hope we are the intermediate parties who may be able to settle or compromise that matter, and bring them to one.
- But I don't understand that there is a great want of harmony.
- The commissioners stand on the middle ground.
- They are the power which brings the companies and the public together, and keeps the one safe and the other secured.
- We are here, as I understand it, as the friends of the companies, and as the friends of the public, and if there is any conflict between the companies and the public, I hope we are the intermediate parties who may be able to settle or compromise that matter, and bring them to one.
1871-1, NAIC Proceedings, National Insurance Convention
- I have been present at such meetings more than once when the whole course of a debate on some important question was changed by the halting remarks of some man who was reluctantly moved by a compelling sense of responsibility to combat theories and statements which had been glibly presented and generally accepted and which he knew to be erroneous, wholly or in part.
-- Alexander C. Humphreys, President of Stevens Institute of Technology
1920 - Proceedings of the Association of Life Insurance Presidents - Annual Meeting, Life Insurance Association of America: Volume 14
- G. Criteria for Collaboration
- The following questions are designed to assist states with the determination of whether an issue is appropriate for collaboration.
- Regulators are encouraged to review these questions whenever there is an issue of concern raised that involves a regulated entity that does business in many states.
- ^^If there is not a reference available from the NAIC Research Library or NAIC Market Regulation Department, your concern is not likely going to impact other states.
2011 1207 - NAIC/FIO Meeting on Market Conduct - 83p
- He pointed out, however, that ARIA is the organization for insurance academics and symposia of this type will serve to foster research in insurance regulation.
- He said the purpose of the symposium would be to promote interaction between insurance regulators and academics and provide for thoughtful discussion of important regulatory and public policy issues in insurance.
- Each symposium could be organized around a general theme as opposed to a narrow topic, which would provide some degree of cohesiveness while broadening the potential interest in the symposium.
- The symposium would be oriented toward applying theoretical concepts and critical analysis to practical regulatory problems.
- Papers would be solicited and presented on topics related to the symposium theme and sessions would be organized around the different topics and papers.
- Participants in the sessions would represent a range of perspectives including regulatory, academic and industry.
- The primary focus would be discussion of the papers but participants would be encouraged to present general views on the topic as well.
- President Walsh said he believes that the symposium will significantly contribute to regulators' and academics' understanding of important policy issues in insurance
- Upon motion duly made and seconded, the subcommittee received the report on the overview of the Annual Regulatory Issues Symposium.
1994-4, NAIC Proceedings
- Commissioner Hager requested that the NAIC staff reestablish a liaison with the American Bar Association (ABA) and the North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) and to advise the Task Force if changes in the Uniform Securities Act are proposed.
- Commissioner Hager also suggested the Task Force establish a working relationship with the following state regulators: (1) securities (2) banks and (3) savings and loans.
Financial Services and Insurance Regulation (EX) Task Force
1988-2, NAIC Proceedings - March 14, 1988
- (p17) - Susan Voss (IA-Insurance Commissioner / NAIC President). - I would say that one of the positives that has come out of the whole Dodd-Frank debate was reaching out to Federal regulators to share information.
- And I have to say, we have struck a very good conversation with Chairman Schapiro from the SEC about consumer issues.
- And whenever we are in Washington, we always reach out to her and her staff.
- And we actually have regular dialogues.
- The Federal Reserve comes to our meetings.
- So I think as far as consumer protection, I would agree that this new body does not have authority over insurance.
- But we are reaching out to talk to Federal regulators on a regular basis about consumer issues.
- Because we know that people who are buying insurance products may be interested in securities products and other financial instruments.
- And for us to at least have regular dialogue with them is very helpful in the interchange of information.
- And I have to say, we have struck a very good conversation with Chairman Schapiro from the SEC about consumer issues.
- Robert Hurt (R-VA). Madam Chairwoman, do you see any basis for future expansion of the CFPB’s footprint into insurance absent legislation by the United States Congress?
- Susan Voss. - I don’t think so. I hope not.
2011 0728 and 1025 - GOV (House) - Insurance Oversight: Policy Implications for U.S. Consumers, Businesses and Jobs - Part 1 (2011 0728), Part 2 (2011 1025) - [PDF-285p, VIDEO-?]
- Communication is key: The public demands information.
- The Federal Reserve System, including the FRBNY, long operated in relative anonymity.
- “We weren’t used to sharing information,” Dahlgren said. “We were a closed society.”
- The mindset was, “we do monetary policy, and nobody needs to know what that is,” she said.
- That changed with the financial crisis, when billions of dollars in public money propped up private companies.
- The idea of communicating to the public and with Congress wasn’t on my radar until all of a sudden, there was enormous backlash.
- You’ve got enormous compensation issues and a whole bunch of things that we didn’t really anticipate.
- “We weren’t used to sharing information,” Dahlgren said. “We were a closed society.”
2021 04 - Yale - Lessons Learned: Sarah Dahlgren - Journal of Financial Crises - 3p