Duty to Read
- Many Misunderstandings with Reference to its Terms and Conditions might thus be removed.
1922 - American Agency Bulletin, Volume 19
- Law Reviews
- 1974 - LR - Duty to Read--A Changing Concept, by John D. Calamari - 23p
- Legal Cases
- 2008 - LC - AmerUs vs Smith - Supreme Court of Alabama - Decision - 53p
- Couch v. Wilco Life Insurance - jdsupra.com/legalnews/read-your-policy-carefully-ul-policy-s-85417/
- Duty to Read – Walker v LSW
- 2008 - LC - AmerUs vs Smith - Supreme Court of Alabama - Decision - 53p
- D. Duty to Read Policy
- The Alabama Supreme Court rejected the fraud and negligence claims of an insured who admittedly did not read his policy, reversed a jury verdict in favor of the insured, and entered judgment in favor of the insurer in AmerUS Life Insurance Co. v. Smith.336
- On appeal, the court held that a plaintiff who is capable of reading documents, but who does not read them or investigate facts that should provoke inquiry, has not reasonably relied upon a oral representations that contradict the written terms in the documents.337"
2009 - RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN HEALTH INSURANCE, LIFE INSURANCE, AND DISABILITY INSURANCE CASE LAW. Hasman, J., Chittenden, W., Doolin, E., & Wall, J.Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal, 44(2), 501-549. (page 544)