Varacallo v. Mass. Mut. Life Ins

 Varacallo v. Mass. Mut. Life Ins

• 2000 – LC – Varacallo v. Mass. Mut. Life Ins.
  • Co., 752 A. 2d 807 – NJ: Appellate Div. 2000
  • 32 N.J. Super. 31 (App. Div. 2000); see also Varacallo v. Massachusetts Mutual 26 Life Ins. Co., 226 F.R.D. 207, 215-16; 233-34 (D.N.J. 2005)

• JULIYAH MUHAMMAD v. COUNTY BANK OF REHOBOTH BEACH, DELAWARE, EASY CASH, TELECASH, AND MAIN STREET SERVICE : 
  CORPORATION, JOHN DOE, AND JOHN ROE,
• SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY DOCKET NO. 58,430
• ON CERTIFICATION TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY : APPELLATE DIVISION Docket No. Below: A-0558-04T3
• JULIYAH MUHAMMAD v. COUNTY BANK OF REHOBOTH BEACH – BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE LEGAL SERVICES OF NEW JERSEY – Varacallo v. MassMutual – 45p
  • “[S]ince the financial losses of most of the Class Members is relatively small, very few would have an interest or ability to pursue their own individual case. This is demonstrated by the relative absence of policyholder suits now pending–only eight cases pending against MassMutual in the entire United States. . . . Absent class certification, very few individuals would have the incentive or resources to bring individual claims against MassMutual.”)