Skip to content
1991 0717 and 0724 – GOV (House) – Life Insurance Solvency Issues – Cardiss Collins (D-IL)
- 1991 0717 and 0724 – GOV (House) – Life Insurance Solvency Issues – Cardiss Collins (D-IL) — [BonkNote]
- [PDF-217p-GooglePlay, <VIDEO-?-0717> 0724-VIDEO-CSPAN] ->Not on govinfo.gov – R
- 0717
- (CSPAN) – Insurance Insolvencies, (NAIC) – The Impact of Junk Bonds, Real Estate and Mortgages on the Life Insurance Industry
- 1991 0717 – NAIC Testimony – Terence Lennon, New York Department of Insurance – 17p
- 1991 0717 – NAIC Testimony – Richard D. Baum, Chief Deputy Insurance Commissioner State Of California – 21p
- 1991 0717 – NAIC Testimony – Thomas H. Borman, Partner, Maslon, Edelman, Borman and Brand, Former Commissioner of Commerce, State of Minnesota – 9p
- 0724
- Marcia Horton – ACLI / Lincoln National Life Insurance Company – Vice President – Government Relations
- Bert McKasy – Commissioner – Minnesota
- Olga Pegelow – Chicago, IL – Policyholder
- Eden Sarfaty – President – National Org. Life Health Ins. Guaranty (NOLHGA)
- House – Committee on Energy and Commerce – Subcommittee on Commerce, Consumer Protection, and Competitiveness
- The Impact of Junk Bonds, Real Estate and Mortgages on the Life Insurance Industry
- 0724 –
- The committee heard testimony from insurance industry representatives on the reliability state-run insurance guarantee funds, which are intended to repay holders of insurance policies from insurance companies that go bankrupt.
- Witnesses included two elderly holders of insurance policies who lost money upon the financial failure of the companies with which they held policies
- 1991 0717 – NAIC Testimony – Terence Lennon, New York Department of Insurance – 17p
- (p4) – Individual Products
- The most important feature of the new individual products was the unbundling or separation of the fund accumulation from the mortality function.
- In this way the consumer could be shown his or her fund and the earnings credited to it as a separate element.
- Universal life and a variety of variable life and annuity products were the chief vehicles in this effort.
- (p5) – The key risks for these products were the spread risk and the potential disintermediation risk in the event they were surrendered in response to interest rate changes.
- Traditional life company management structures were not well suited to managing these risks. (p5)
Scroll To Top